A comment on the latest update

l10n
#1

Hi Everybody,

I only wish to express my consideration concerning the last commitment in
Pootle.

- First, we'd need some time more for translations. We finished the work but my
opinion is that the latest call for translation was too much sudden and close
to the end date.

- Second, why is the readme file merged with the other file? Is there a reason?
Shouldn't be better different files for different purposes?

Best regards,

#2

2010.12.12. 18:36 keltezéssel, Valter Mura írta:

Hi Everybody,

I only wish to express my consideration concerning the last commitment in
Pootle.

- First, we'd need some time more for translations. We finished the work but my
opinion is that the latest call for translation was too much sudden and close
to the end date.

- Second, why is the readme file merged with the other file? Is there a reason?
Shouldn't be better different files for different purposes?

Best regards,

Hi Valter,

RC2 was scheduled to next week, the readme issue was discovered too
late. I agree that this is unfortunate and should not repeat. Thanks for
your efforts.

New readme strings was merged into lo-build-* files, because from the
technical point of view this was the reasonable way to do it. However,
this is only temporary for LibreOffice 3.3, we'll get rid of lo-build-*
files soon.

Best regards,
Andras

#3

In data domenica 12 dicembre 2010 18:47:12, Andras Timar ha scritto:

> - First, we'd need some time more for translations. We finished the work
> but my opinion is that the latest call for translation was too much
> sudden and close to the end date.
>
> - Second, why is the readme file merged with the other file? Is there a
> reason? Shouldn't be better different files for different purposes?
>
Hi Valter,

RC2 was scheduled to next week, the readme issue was discovered too
late. I agree that this is unfortunate and should not repeat. Thanks for
your efforts.

New readme strings was merged into lo-build-* files, because from the
technical point of view this was the reasonable way to do it. However,
this is only temporary for LibreOffice 3.3, we'll get rid of lo-build-*
files soon.

Thanks Andras for the very quick response and clarification :slight_smile:

Ciao

#4

Hi,

In data domenica 12 dicembre 2010 18:47:12, Andras Timar ha scritto:

- First, we'd need some time more for translations. We finished the work
but my opinion is that the latest call for translation was too much
sudden and close to the end date.

- Second, why is the readme file merged with the other file? Is there a
reason? Shouldn't be better different files for different purposes?

Hi Valter,

RC2 was scheduled to next week, the readme issue was discovered too
late. I agree that this is unfortunate and should not repeat. Thanks for
your efforts.

New readme strings was merged into lo-build-* files, because from the
technical point of view this was the reasonable way to do it. However,
this is only temporary for LibreOffice 3.3, we'll get rid of lo-build-*
files soon.

Thanks Andras for the very quick response and clarification :slight_smile:

+1 and thanks to all for you commitment given the so short delays and lack of real process. It's great to have you all on board :slight_smile:
I hope we will soon be able to work on a complete and easy process for every one.

Kind regards
Sophie