[ANNOUNCE] LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 translation

l10n
#1

Hi,

I updated Pootle with the latest templates. I'll push your
translations for LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 Sunday night or Monday. If you
can't work on it this weekend, don't worry, you'll have many
opportunities to update translations, there will be many releases in
the next weeks. Also, there might be further string changes.

For those, who don't use Pootle, files are at the regular place:
http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-SDF/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26.sdf.bz2
http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-POT/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26-UI.pot.zip
http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-POT/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26-help.pot.zip

Thanks,
Andras

#2

BTW, what's the difference between 'Range' and 'Scope' (may be found in sc/source/ui/src, e.g., under ID
#: namedlg.src#RID_SCDLG_NAMES.FT_SCOPE.fixedtext.text)? I didn't look too hard, and I don't use Calc much, so I couldn't find 'Scope' in dialogs readily.

Help site doesn't help with this, too (search produces lots of this:
! scope="col" | Fields ! scope="col" | {{ProductName}} Tag
looks like wiki markup).

Yury

#3

Hi Andras,

I guess that this should give a lot of work. Can You please tell me the
KeyID from new strings?

If You can´t do it, please let me know

#4

Hi Sergio,

Hi,

I updated Pootle with the latest templates. I'll push your
translations for LibreOffice 3.5 beta0 Sunday night or Monday. If you
can't work on it this weekend, don't worry, you'll have many
opportunities to update translations, there will be many releases in
the next weeks. Also, there might be further string changes.

For those, who don't use Pootle, files are at the regular place:

http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-SDF/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26.sdf.bz2

http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-POT/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26-UI.pot.zip

http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/latest-POT/libreoffice-3-5-en-US-2011-11-26-help.pot.zip

Thanks,
Andras

Hi Andras,

I guess that this should give a lot of work. Can You please tell me the
KeyID from new strings?

If You can´t do it, please let me know

A lot of work? Your language (pt) has complete UI, and 362 words are
left from help, so basically you are done for beta0. For future
updates I can't give you the KeyIDs of new strings, but you will see
them in Pootle as new or fuzzy.

Best regards,
Andras

#5

Hi,

I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal
errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but please fix these
problems in Pootle, too (and check for at least 'xmltags' errors
regularly).

Languages with fatal errors: da, pt, pt-BR, tr, zh-CN. Please check
all bugs at http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/3.5-beta0-l10nbugs/

Thanks,
Andras

#6

Hello Andras

If I recall correctly (my memory may fail), I used to locate a string in pootle with the the "par_id" number... as in

helpcontent2 source\text\scalc\01\04060120.xhp 0 help par_id4146942

It was precise and straightforward. No mistake.

However, now, this number is not in the comments area anymore... so I have to look from the xhp file...

Am I correct in this diagnosis?

Thank you

Olivier

#7

Hello Olivier,

Hello Andras

If I recall correctly (my memory may fail), I used to locate a string in
pootle with the the "par_id" number... as in

helpcontent2    source\text\scalc\01\04060120.xhp       0       help
 par_id4146942

It was precise and straightforward. No mistake.

However, now, this number is not in the comments area anymore... so I have
to look from the xhp file...

Am I correct in this diagnosis?

https://translations.documentfoundation.org/pt_BR/libo35x_help/translate.html?search=par_id4146942&sfields=source&sfields=target&sfields=notes&sfields=locations

Seems to be working...

Andras

#8

Hi, Andras Timar, *,

Hi,

I pushed translations yesterday morning to git. I fixed a few fatal
errors in git only, so build won't break on them, but please fix these
problems in Pootle, too (and check for at least 'xmltags' errors
regularly).

Languages with fatal errors: da, pt, pt-BR, tr, zh-CN. Please check
all bugs at http://ftp.fsf.hu/LibreOffice/3.5-beta0-l10nbugs/

zh-CN should be fixed now.

Two strings updated:
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/zh_CN/libo35x_help/shared/guide.po/translate/?unit=13249681
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/zh_CN/libo35x_help/translate.html?unit=14881515

Thanks,
Andras

Best wishes,
Dean (@xslidian)

#9

Yes, it´s complete. But my issue is that Olivier said I have mistakes in

Ne9f
7T_Q
#tUX
Lri2

and I can´t find them in pootle. But thanks anyway.

Sérgio Marques

#10

Fixed for pt

#11

Fixed for da as well.

/Leif

#12

https://liorkaplan.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/translation-status-for-libreoffice-3-5-0-beta0/

#13

I presume you used Pootle stats, not actual stats, so Slovenian (100%
!) , Romanian and Serbian are not in your stats. What script did you
use?

Anyway, thanks for bloging about the status! :slight_smile:

Thanks,
Andras

#14

>
https://liorkaplan.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/translation-status-for-libreoffice-3-5-0-beta0/
>

I presume you used Pootle stats, not actual stats, so Slovenian (100%
!) , Romanian and Serbian are not in your stats. What script did you
use?

Pootle status indeed, no script was used. So languages not in Pootle
weren't included.

Anyway, thanks for bloging about the status! :slight_smile:

Gladly (:

#15

Hi Andras

Scratching my head and testing more, I found a weird behaviour with pootle search facility.

The first search of a bad word works correctly, it returns a list of matches. On each element I change the bad word to a good word and submit.

But I want now to redo the search with the bad word... As in double-checking the task I just did. I type the bad word in the search box, set the scope, and hit return.

I get the same list, but filled with the good words, that I just corrected.

Bizarre...

So, it appears (IMHO) the search is done in a sort of data cache, but the matches are taken from the database. Lokks like a synch is missing there.

Could it be?

Regards

Olivier

#16

Hi Olivier,

So, it appears (IMHO) the search is done in a sort of data cache, but the
matches are taken from the database. Lokks like a synch is missing there.

Could it be?

Yes, I'm sure that generation of search indexes does not happen in
real time, but I don't know much about Pootle internals.

Best regards,
Andras

#17

24 hours, more or less