![[TEST] Document Foundation Community](https://communitytest.documentfoundation.org/images/discourse-logo-sketch.png){kind=logo}
Hi
There is a small error in the currency format in Calc: Danish "Kr." is shown without the period ("Kr").
I can't find the string in pootle - where do I go/who do I tell to fix it?
Jesper
Hi Jesper,
There is a small error in the currency format in Calc: Danish "Kr." is shown
without the period ("Kr").
It's lower case "kr" though and should be "kr." instead, correct?
I can't find the string in pootle - where do I go/who do I tell to fix it?
These things are managed by locale data, I can do. So, "kr.", yes?
  Eike
I would also like to add a currency simbol.
The Paraguayan currency simbol can either be G. Gs. or ₲
The ₲ is missing and I was also looking to add it in pootle but I couldn't
find it. Can it be add?
PYG ₲ Guarani (Paraguay)
I also noticed that it says
- PYG G Spanish (Paraguay)
- PYG Gs Guarani (Paraguay)
They should both be Guarani and not Spanish.
-Gio
These are locales, not currency names…
Yes, correct
Jesper
Ok then
Can these 'locales' be fixed and add the PYG ₲ Guarani (Paraguay) that I
requested?
Hi Giovanni,
I would also like to add a currency simbol.
The Paraguayan currency simbol can either be G. Gs. or ₲
The ₲ is missing and I was also looking to add it in pootle but I couldn't
find it. Can it be add?
*Add* or *replace* the existing 'G' and/or 'Gs'?
PYG ₲ Guarani (Paraguay)
I also noticed that it says
- PYG G Spanish (Paraguay)
- PYG Gs Guarani (Paraguay)
One (G) is from the es-PY locale, the other (Gs) from the gug-PY locale.
Are both, 'G' and 'Gs', in use, or only one, or should they both be
replaced with '₲'?
  Eike
Hi Jesper,
> These things are managed by locale data, I can do. So, "kr.", yes?
Yes, correct
Done in
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commit;h=17040a69abe325df05c22dcb811d81785211bf47
  Eike
Hi Jesper,
> > There is a small error in the currency format in Calc: Danish "Kr." is shown
> It's lower case "kr" though and should be "kr." instead, correct?
Just saw that Faroese fo-FO and Kalaallisut kl-GL are also affected,
I'll correct them as well if there is no objection.
  Eike
That would be correct
Hi Jesper,
> Just saw that Faroese fo-FO and Kalaallisut kl-GL are also affected,
> I'll correct them as well if there is no objection.
That would be correct
Done in
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commit;h=5037dc9b23a9ef0ba44ed0c371da6af7332a7519
  Eike
Hi Eike
I need to add '₲'.
Both G and Gs are fine. We use all 3 of them, they are interchangeable.
According to this website, the locale is es-PY
Hi Giovanni,
It would had been a tad easier for me if you replied to my actual
message talking about *-PY locales instead of another one in this
thread.. anyway..
I need to add '₲'.
Both G and Gs are fine. We use all 3 of them, they are interchangeable.
Ok.
According to this website, the locale is es-PY
As said, we have two Paraguayan locales, es-PY and gug-PY, so I assume
I should add '₲' to both.
Btw, that localeplanet page looks nice, but it uses old ICU data as of
ICU 49.1. I suggest to rather use http://cldr.unicode.org/index/charts
and http://demo.icu-project.org/icu-bin/locexp
  Eike
Hi,
> I need to add '₲'.
>
> Both G and Gs are fine. We use all 3 of them, they are interchangeable.Ok.
Well, I forgot that 'G' is of the es-PY locale and 'Gs' is of the gug-PY
locale. So shall all three symbols be available in both locales?
I assume yes if I understood you correctly.
  Eike
Well, I forgot that 'G' is of the es-PY locale and 'Gs' is of the gug-PY
locale. So shall all three symbols be available in both locales?
I assume yes if I understood you correctly.
Yes, exactly like that.
Thanks
Hi Giovanni,
> Well, I forgot that 'G' is of the es-PY locale and 'Gs' is of the gug-PY
> locale. So shall all three symbols be available in both locales?
> I assume yes if I understood you correctly.Yes, exactly like that.
Done with
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=fabb8f48dd89d71378daf293a974a412deccc961
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0f6a4ab13ec3dd4f9df0cb10e2de2c648cc4b0ac
  Eike
Thank you
Will it be included in 5.2.2 or 5.3?
-Gio
Hi Giovanni,
Will it be included in 5.2.2 or 5.3?
In 5.3, as I changed also code to exclude duplicated format codes from
the number formats dialog because of the resulting multiple identical
entries using the ISO code. In case that creates some unwanted side
effect we'll have time to fix it.
  Eike