Italian user list seems to be broken or in busy state: what's the matter?

l10n
#1

Hi Everyone,

Italian user list (users@it.libreoffice.org) seems to be broken or in some "busy state": what's the matter?
It may be since about January the 4th.

I don't know if this is the only one in this state (italian or other languages).

Could someone check it or them and fix the trouble?

Thank you very much!

Carlo

#2

Hello Carlo,

Italian user list (users@it.libreoffice.org) seems to be broken or in
some "busy state": what's the matter?
It may be since about January the 4th.

I don't know if this is the only one in this state (italian or other
languages).

Could someone check it or them and fix the trouble?

Thank you very much!

I just checked, and the list seems to work fine. Not many messages coming in, but the last one was from January 11th, sent by you: http://www.mail-archive.com/users@it.libreoffice.org/msg00451.html

Florian

#3

Hi *,

Italian user list (users@it.libreoffice.org) seems to be broken or in
some "busy state": what's the matter?
It may be since about January the 4th.

[...]
I just checked, and the list seems to work fine. Not many messages coming
in, but the last one was from January 11th, sent by you:

To add on that: Looking at the logs: A couple of messages have been
rejected as SPAM, but judging from the sender-addresses
"do-not-reply@select2gether.com" or "noresponder@yahoo.com.es" or
"mrcostaakdam162@msn.com" those rejections seem to be legitimate.

But you might post a notice stating something "if you receive a
message stating that your post was rejected as spam, please send again
and cc the postmaster (@documentfoundation.org) address to evaluate
the reason".

But to state it clearly: I as well as Florian see nothing wrong with
the list - it just is a more silent list - not unusual for it to not
receive a post for a few days.

ciao
Christian

#4

Hi *,

Italian user list (users@it.libreoffice.org) seems to be broken or in
some "busy state": what's the matter?
It may be since about January the 4th.

[...]
I just checked, and the list seems to work fine. Not many messages coming
in, but the last one was from January 11th, sent by you:

To add on that: Looking at the logs: A couple of messages have been
rejected as SPAM, but judging from the sender-addresses
"do-not-reply@select2gether.com" or "noresponder@yahoo.com.es" or
"mrcostaakdam162@msn.com" those rejections seem to be legitimate.

But you might post a notice stating something "if you receive a
message stating that your post was rejected as spam, please send again
and cc the postmaster (@documentfoundation.org) address to evaluate
the reason".

But to state it clearly: I as well as Florian see nothing wrong with
the list - it just is a more silent list - not unusual for it to not
receive a post for a few days.

ciao
Christian

Thank you to Everyone, but (...) someone of us receive something like this:

-------- Messaggio originale --------

#5

Hi,

     Remote MTA bilbo.documentfoundation.org: SMTP diagnostic: 550
5.7.1<users@it.libreoffice.org>: Recipient address rejected: Mail
appears to be spam or forged and is rejected due to policy. Using cached
results - retrying too fast. penalty: 30 seconds x 0 retries.

Whati do you think about?

this means that the mailserver trying to deliver messages has been put on several (external, non-TDF) blacklists, probably for sending out spam. It is mainly your provider's duty to fix this problem. We need to rely on blacklists for spam filtering.

In cases where your provider cannot help you, we can -temporarily- whitelist the sending server. So, first is to ping your provider and tell him he seems to be blacklisted due to spamming. In case that does not help, the next time you receive such a message, please send a direct note to postmaster@documentfoundation.org, with the date and time of the original message, and we will investigate.

Sorry for any inconveniences,
Florian

#6

Thank you all!

It happens sometimes that libero.it smtp is seen as spammer. This time to Felix others to me. I'll keep in mind your suggestions.
I think too it's better to rely on blcklists for spam filtering! :wink:

Carlo