LO Pootle

l10n
#1

Þann fim 6.jan 2011 14:55, skrifaði Andre Schnabel:
<snip>

So - for our current workflow (where unfortunately sdf will stay for
a while, as "internal" file format) it does not really matter if you
use po or xliff - it's more or less a matter of taste.

I'd prefere xliff. given the fact, that we process the files with
translate toolkit in our build environment anyway, it should be easy
to leave the joice to the language team and have the build enviroment
work with either xliff or po.

Just curious; if the software would be adapted to use .mo files (compiled from .po) instead of .sdf, would there be speed issues ?

It's quite nice when translating software UI to generate .mo's from the .po's and dumping them into the LC_MESSAGES folder, restart application and you see your changes right away.

regards,
Sveinn í Felli