Where are Emojis in Sorbian LO builds?

Hi,

I was looking for Sorbian emojis I translated on Pootle but I don't find them anywhere in LibreOffice. AFAIK they should be displayed in Tools --> Autocorrect --> Autorcorrect Options... --> Replace but there is nothing. I tried to define a conversion rule but it didn't work.

Thank you in advance.

Michael

Hi Michael,

Hi,

I was looking for Sorbian emojis I translated on Pootle but I don't find
them anywhere in LibreOffice. AFAIK they should be displayed in Tools
--> Autocorrect --> Autorcorrect Options... --> Replace but there is
nothing. I tried to define a conversion rule but it didn't work.

They should be there:
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/dsb/libo_ui/translate/extras/source/

Cheers
Sophie

sophi schrieb:

They should be there:
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/dsb/libo_ui/translate/extras/source/

Hi Sophie,

I think you misunderstood me. They have been already translated. No, I mean that they are not shown in the LO master builds in Tools--> Autocorrect --> Autocorrect Options... --> Replace. But, meanwhile, I think why they are not displayed: The files /share/autocorrect/acor_hsb resp. acor_dsb do not exist. This could be the reason. Am I right?

Need I create these files myself, manually?

Regards,

Michael

Hi Michael,

sophi schrieb:

They should be there:
https://translations.documentfoundation.org/dsb/libo_ui/translate/extras/source/

Hi Sophie,

I think you misunderstood me. They have been already translated. No, I
mean that they are not shown in the LO master builds in Tools-->
Autocorrect --> Autocorrect Options... --> Replace. But, meanwhile, I
think why they are not displayed: The files /share/autocorrect/acor_hsb
resp. acor_dsb do not exist. This could be the reason. Am I right?

Need I create these files myself, manually?

The file should be build at runtime, so if it's not present it's a bug
and you should fill it in bugzilla. Cloph is back now, so I'll discuss
with him tomorrow about the sites and your issue, but it's always better
to have a bug number to follow-up.
Cheers
Sophie

sophi schrieb:

The file should be build at runtime, so if it's not present it's a bug
and you should fill it in bugzilla. Cloph is back now, so I'll discuss
with him tomorrow about the sites and your issue, but it's always better
to have a bug number to follow-up.

Hi Sophie,

thank you for your reply.

I filed bug 121726:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121726

Regards,

Michael